NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs AMD FirePro S7100X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and AMD FirePro S7100X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- 4x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 64.888
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 1283.973
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 5.781
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 70.708
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 315.677
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 25 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 vs 64.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 vs 1283.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 vs 5.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 vs 70.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 vs 315.677 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7100X
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7100X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | AMD FirePro S7100X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12678 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 450 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 | 64.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 | 1283.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 | 5.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 | 70.708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 | 315.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9538 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 | AMD FirePro S7100X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 25 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 230 | 751 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |