NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1029 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 8.5x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 3840 vs 640
• 8.5x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 2 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12678 vs 2411
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53285 vs 12495
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 49.772
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 757.295
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 3.67
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 49.875
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 179.567
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9538 vs 5157
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9538 vs 5157

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 450
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3699
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3340
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3699
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12678 2411
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	450 631
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53285 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	300.355 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3559.383 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.757 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	204.32 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1214.142 179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9538 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9538 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 7859

Compare specifications (specs)