NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P40 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1013 MHz
• 4.7x more texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1,280
• 4.7x better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12678 vs 6186
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 450 vs 417
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53363 vs 19089
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 81.104
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 1235.338
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 6.157
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 68.443
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 251.464
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9538 vs 7602
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2749
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3093
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9538 vs 7602
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2749
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12678 6186
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	450 417
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53363 19089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	300.355 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3559.383 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.757 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	204.32 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1214.142 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9538 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9538 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3093

Compare specifications (specs)