NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1230 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 9.9x more texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 6.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 768
• 9.9x better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8260 vs 2818
• 15.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 10312
• 18.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 vs 31.528
• 15.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 vs 2.985
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 vs 59.153
• 14.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 vs 152.484
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 vs 3572
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 327
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3521
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3360
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3521
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8260 2818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	327 659
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	163779 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	592.008 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.266 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	271.318 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2169.759 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9969 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3521 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9969 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3521 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 17597

Compare specifications (specs)