NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1230 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1536
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8260 vs 6559
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163779 vs 27108
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 vs 8931
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 vs 8931
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1230 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops vs 3,656 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 vs 6559 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 vs 27108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 vs 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 vs 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 327
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3521
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3521
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3521 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 | 6559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163779 | 27108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3521 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 | 8931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3521 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 155 | 327 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1230 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | 114.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 204.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 |