NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
- 7.4x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 179995 vs 70535
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16337 vs 6316
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16337 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 June 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1312 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 179995 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3719
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3360
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3719
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 179995 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GV100 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 21 June 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 135 | 165 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1312 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21,100 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with others
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
