NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 106.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 48
- 15.9x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 29.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 4466
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 2475
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 2475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 4466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 2475 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 958 vs 62
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 958 vs 62
- 40.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 57
- 40.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 | 4466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 62 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 62 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 57 | 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 57 | 2304 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Volta | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | GV100 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 258 | 789 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21,100 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB with others
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
