NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 7.7x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
• 7.7x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63287 vs 10312
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 31.528
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 828.57
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 2.985
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 152.484
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 3572
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 21.354
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3696
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3333
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3696
• 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	63287 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.792 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2368.267 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.829 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.354 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	992.132 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10841 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3696 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 17597

Compare specifications (specs)