AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 925 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 84.381
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1389.754
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 8.872
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 101.929
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 481.76
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 9448
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 9448
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 22 December 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1375 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 45% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1408
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3463
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1408 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 22 December 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 481 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 925 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 274 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1375 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |