AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 713 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1086 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 121.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 87.861
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1362.14
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 6.025
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 106.141
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 250.267
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 5579
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3463 versus 1691
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 1565
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 5579
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3463 versus 1691
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 1565
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 18 November 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 713 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1086 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 121.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 87.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1362.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 6.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 106.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 250.267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 5579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 versus 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 1565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 5579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 versus 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 1565 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1408
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 87.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1362.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 6.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 106.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 250.267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 5579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 1565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 5579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 1565 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5586 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 18 November 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 470 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1086 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 713 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 121.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,892 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
