AMD Radeon Pro W5700X versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1243 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 54% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1855 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 277.9 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43810 versus 34593
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 versus 9983
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 versus 9983
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2443
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 versus 1674
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 versus 1674
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 728
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 versus 8023
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1243 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2048 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 versus 34593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 versus 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 versus 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 versus 1674 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 versus 728 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 versus 8023 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Environ 71% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 205 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 205 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 34593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 1674 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 728 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 8023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3700 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Ellesmere |
| Date de sortie | Q3'2020 | 4 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 146 | 369 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1855 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | 32 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1243 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.9 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 12 inches (305 mm) | 241 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5700X avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
