AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 250 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.0 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 512
- 4.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,096 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 versus 1901
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 versus 530
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 versus 24.788
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 638.196
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 versus 2.619
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 41.414
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 112.347
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 versus 3666
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 versus 3666
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 versus 1901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 versus 530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 versus 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 versus 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 6138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 675 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 372 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 4,313 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |