AMD Radeon R9 270X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 876 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.455 versus 62.027
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.545 versus 1218.137
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.339 versus 5.835
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 versus 36.842
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.366 versus 215.546
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 versus 19 February 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.455 versus 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 versus 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 versus 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 versus 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 versus 215.546 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 187.5 billion / sec versus 84 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 2688 versus 1280
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,709 gflops versus 2,688 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 versus 4893
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 versus 612
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 versus 8068
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 versus 8068
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2901 versus 1771
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 187.5 billion / sec versus 84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,709 gflops versus 2,688 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 versus 4893 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 versus 612 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 versus 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 versus 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 versus 1771 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4893 | 8190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | 630 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.455 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 | 2901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23915 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Curacao | GK110 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 | 19 February 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 441 | 428 |
| Prix maintenant | $399 | $2,054.59 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | 5.09 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,688 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2688 |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2688 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 270X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro W7100
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon E6465
