AMD Radeon R9 280X versus AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD Radeon HD 7990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 versus 5566
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 versus 88.665
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 434.598
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 versus 6689
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 versus 6689
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 versus 24 April 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 versus 5566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 versus 88.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 434.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 versus 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7990
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 2048
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,096 gflops versus 4,096 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 3 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 675
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1753.494 versus 1434.496
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.437 versus 7.656
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.328 versus 87.459
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,096 gflops versus 4,096 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 3 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1753.494 versus 1434.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.437 versus 7.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.328 versus 87.459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3700 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 280X | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 | 5566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | 88.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | 1753.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | 8.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | 88.328 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | 434.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 280X | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | Malta |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 | 24 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 372 | 417 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,126.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2048 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 275 mm | 307 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 280X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
AMDRadeon R9 380
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIATesla K80
