AMD Radeon R9 370X versus AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon R9 270 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1030 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 74 GTexel / s
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2,368 gflops
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 55.721
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 261.843
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 3448
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 3448
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 versus 13 November 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 74 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2,368 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 55.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 261.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 versus 1139.703
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 versus 5.39
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 versus 88.44
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 versus 1139.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 versus 5.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 versus 88.44 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 55.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1282.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 5.927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 93.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 261.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3347 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | Curacao |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 13 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $179 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 516 | 509 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 210 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
