AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1628 MHz
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 888
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 141.066
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1628 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 141.066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 52% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 463.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 versus 16667
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 versus 77153
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 252.601
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1322.129
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 versus 14699
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 versus 14699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 463.0 GTexel / s versus 304.8 GT/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 versus 16667 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 versus 77153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1322.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 versus 14699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | 20021 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 888 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 160720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Volta |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $8,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 95 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1696 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
