AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 791
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77150 versus 74179
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 153.677
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77150 versus 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 153.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 16670
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 252.601
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 3949.565
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 24.769
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1322.129
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 14699
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 14699
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 9488
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 16670 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 252.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 3949.565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 24.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1322.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 14699 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 9488 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16670 | 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77150 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9488 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $6,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 112 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
