AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 versus 444
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34842 versus 29463
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.237 versus 111.55
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1371.266
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 8.49
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 versus 19.803
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 versus 509.222
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3654
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3654
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3788 versus 3667
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 15 August 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34842 versus 29463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 versus 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 versus 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 versus 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3654 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 versus 3667 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 versus 7711
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 9258
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 9258
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 versus 7711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34842 | 29463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 | 3667 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GP106B |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 335 | 401 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 4,400 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |