AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 72% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2321 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2581 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 versus 928
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 versus 5461.22
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 versus 174.185
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 versus 3718
- 15.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 versus 3358
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 versus 3718
- 15.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 Mar 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 2321 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2581 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 versus 928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 versus 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 versus 174.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 19824
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 versus 100473
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 349.422
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 34.064
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1699.337
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 15315
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 15315
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 versus 2435
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 19824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 versus 100473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 versus 2435 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 3537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 22 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 3 Mar 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $479 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 51 | 91 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2581 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 2321 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 413.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17200 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |