AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 2105 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 3840
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26853 versus 22318
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 973
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161035 versus 126234
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 432.118
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 41.585
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 2280.457
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 versus 16162
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 versus 16162
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 versus 16306
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 2105 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 3840 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 versus 22318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 versus 126234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 versus 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 versus 16162 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 versus 16306 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 320.733
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3373 versus 3350
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3373 versus 3350
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 320.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | 22318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 | 126234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 383.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 16306 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $579 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 76 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | 60 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 26800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
