AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 47 Watt
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 7 February 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 47 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- 4.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 GTexel / s versus 52 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,894 gflops versus 1,664 gflops
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 256 MB
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 versus 1633
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 373
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 versus 10258
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 versus 29.977
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 versus 309.874
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 versus 2.177
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 versus 35.847
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 versus 167.399
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 versus 2315
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 versus 3162
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 versus 2315
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 versus 3162
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s versus 52 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops versus 1,664 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 256 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 versus 1633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 versus 10258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 versus 29.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 versus 309.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 versus 2.177 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 versus 35.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 versus 167.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 versus 2315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 versus 2315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3339 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1633 | 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10258 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Raven | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 912 | 517 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | |
Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 47 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 3,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 256 MB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz |