AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 55 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 384
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,760 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2106 versus 830
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 versus 253
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 versus 2902
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 versus 10.872
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.578 versus 166.832
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 versus 0.817
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 12.415
- 7.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 36.916
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 versus 1951
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 versus 1693
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 versus 1951
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 versus 1693
- 3.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 18 June 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 versus 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 3107
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 3107
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3107 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Raven | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 795 | 1311 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |