AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 versus 225
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 versus 3353
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 versus 225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2509 versus 1584
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9777 versus 8803
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 25.891
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 365.4
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 2.104
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 37.17
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 132.07
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1514
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2433
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1514
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2433
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 705
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2509 versus 1584 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9777 versus 8803 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 25.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 365.4 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 2.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 37.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 132.07 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 2433 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 705 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | 2509 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8803 | 9777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Owl | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 950 | 930 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded avec des autres
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5600
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDFirePro V4900
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
