Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 224
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 145
- 5.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 635
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 99.563
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 443
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 919
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 1626
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 443
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 919
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 1626
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 versus 5 January 2012 |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 versus 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 versus 635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 99.563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 versus 443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 versus 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 versus 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 versus 443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 versus 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 versus 1626 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 625 MHz versus 400 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 160 versus 20
- 4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 200.0 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 45 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 625 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 200.0 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 145 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 99.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 919 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | Caicos |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 1523 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 625 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 160 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 392 million | 370 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 512 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 8.528 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1066 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |