Intel UHD Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 59% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 753 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 192 versus 144
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 versus 5.332
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 versus 205.545
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 versus 0.635
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 versus 10.932
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.67 versus 22.728
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 versus 169
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1479 versus 562
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 753 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 144 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 versus 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 versus 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 versus 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 versus 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 versus 22.728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 versus 169 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 versus 562 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | 22.728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 169 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1479 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Comet Lake GT2 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1198 | 1458 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 753 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800 GTX
IntelUHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350M
IntelUHD Graphics vs
ATIRadeon HD 2350 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
IntelUHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelUHD Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
