NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1245 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 69.72 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6161 versus 2411
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35607 versus 12495
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.441 versus 49.772
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1047.138 versus 757.295
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.882 versus 3.67
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 versus 49.875
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.498 versus 179.567
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 versus 5157
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 versus 5157
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 13 March 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6161 versus 2411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35607 versus 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 versus 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 versus 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 versus 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 versus 49.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 versus 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 versus 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 versus 5157 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 versus 325
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3707
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3352
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3707
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3352
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 versus 325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6161 | 2411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35607 | 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 49.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | 179.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 7859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2944 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Nom de code | TU117 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 455 | 476 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |