NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
Environ 57% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 672 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 10.8 billion / sec
4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 258.05 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 478
4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 91
2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 2171
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 4.85
Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 195.796
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.561
2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 9.109
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.499 versus 16.727
2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 960
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 2210
Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 2701
2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 960
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 2210
Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 2701

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	27 November 2013 versus 5 January 2011
Vitesse du noyau	1058 MHz versus 672 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	33.9 billion / sec versus 10.8 billion / sec
Pipelines	384 versus 96
Performance á point flottant	812.5 gflops versus 258.05 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1749 versus 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	368 versus 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	4493 versus 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.582 versus 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.463 versus 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.254 versus 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.386 versus 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.499 versus 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663 versus 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478 versus 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 versus 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663 versus 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478 versus 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 versus 2701

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 64 Watt
180x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt versus 64 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	900 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

478

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

368

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4493

2171

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.582

4.85

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

364.463

195.796

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.254

0.561

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.386

9.109

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.499

16.727

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

960

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

2210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

2701

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

960

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

2210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

2701

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1749	478
PassMark - G2D Mark	368	91
Geekbench - OpenCL	4493	2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.582	4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.463	195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.254	0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.386	9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.499	16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663	960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478	2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332	2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663	960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478	2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332	2701
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	545	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Nom de code	GK106	GF108
Date de sortie	27 November 2013	5 January 2011
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$109
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1003	1503
Prix maintenant	$144.81
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	16.05
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	1058 MHz	672 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	384	96
Performance á point flottant	812.5 gflops	258.05 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	384	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	33.9 billion / sec	10.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	64 Watt	35 Watt
Compte de transistor	2,540 million	585 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur	4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Longeur	5.70" (14.5 cm)
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	One 6-pin
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.3	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80.0 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5.0 GB/s	900 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus