NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 889 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 716x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 versus 597
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 versus 22.384
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3679
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3353
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3679
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 889 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 versus 597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 versus 22.384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 4.5x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 640
- 4.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,645 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 versus 2411
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25674 versus 12495
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 versus 49.772
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 versus 757.295
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 versus 3.67
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 290.861 versus 179.567
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 versus 5157
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 versus 5157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 versus 2411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25674 versus 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 versus 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 versus 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 versus 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 versus 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 versus 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 versus 5157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2411 | 9050 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | 597 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | 25674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | 72.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | 1293.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | 7.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | 22.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | 290.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 8721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 8721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 475 | 440 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 889 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 5,645 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 213 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 8760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
