NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 159.275
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 159.275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1470 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 35% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2176
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18814 versus 16572
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 859
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 87107
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 246.191
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 versus 3885.018
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 27.053
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1271.757
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 20969
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 5567
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 5026
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 20969
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 5567
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 5026
- 5483x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10966 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1470 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 2176 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18814 versus 16572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 87107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 versus 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 27.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1271.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16572 | 18814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87107 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 10966 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 145 | 98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |