NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 versus 141.066
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 19663
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 19663
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 27 March 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 versus 141.066 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2304
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 versus 16168
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 824
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 versus 88130
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 252.062
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1303.435
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1628 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2304 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 versus 16168 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 versus 88130 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 252.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1303.435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16168 | 20021 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 | 888 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 | 160720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | 562.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | 141.066 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | 1964.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 27 March 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $8,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 140 | 95 |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1628 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1132 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 870.4 GB / s |