NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 735 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.80 GTexel/s versus 52.80 GTexel/s
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 10 nm
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 versus 2666
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 versus 383
- 4.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 versus 11991
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 79.859
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 versus 1137.615
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 versus 4.569
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 61.688
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 versus 192.566
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 5609
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 2 Sep 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s versus 52.80 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 10 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 versus 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 versus 383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 versus 11991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 79.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 versus 1137.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 4.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 61.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 versus 192.566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 11991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 79.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 1137.615 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 4.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 61.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 192.566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Tiger Lake GT1 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 2 Sep 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 594 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 211.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1.690 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 49.68 GPixel/s | 13.20 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 52.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
