NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 339.841 versus 226.447
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.109 versus 25.476
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 155.642 versus 118.544
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1167.569 versus 1106.12
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 versus 19811
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 versus 3358
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 versus 19811
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 versus 3719
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 versus 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 versus 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 155.642 versus 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 versus 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 98% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 817 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1282 MHz
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 versus 13388
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 589
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 79058
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3898.264
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 8234
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 817 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1282 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 versus 13388 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 79058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3898.264 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 8234 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13388 | 16059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79058 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 | 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3898.264 | 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 | 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 155.642 | 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 | 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8234 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 130 | 154 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |