NVIDIA Quadro GV100 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1628 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- 1166.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 14,817 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 versus 14393
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 800
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 195.478
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 141.066 versus 129.271
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1328.033
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 versus 14744
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 versus 14744
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2018 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1628 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops versus 12.7 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 versus 14393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 versus 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 versus 14744 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 395.80 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 5120
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 160720
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 5120 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1696 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 160720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 | 14393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GV100 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2018 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $8,999 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 95 | 170 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1628 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1132 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | 12.7 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 8192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 463.0 GTexel / s | 395.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 21,100 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 870.4 GB / s | 483.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1696 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |