NVIDIA Quadro K2100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 667 MHz versus 657 MHz
Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3008 MHz versus 2000 MHz
Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 versus 231
Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 2728
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 3333
Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 2728
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 3333

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	23 July 2013 versus 30 May 2013
Vitesse du noyau	667 MHz versus 657 MHz
Vitesse de mémoire	3008 MHz versus 2000 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	287 versus 231
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 versus 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 versus 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 3333

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 576
Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 versus 1363
Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 versus 4566
Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 versus 12.383
Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 358.892
Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 versus 1.107
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 21.761
Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 versus 40.703
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 2294
Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 2294

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	42.05 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 versus 576
Performance á point flottant	1,009 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1714 versus 1363
Geekbench - OpenCL	5605 versus 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673 versus 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958 versus 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512 versus 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422 versus 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992 versus 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836 versus 2294

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1714

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

287

231

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4566

5605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.383

15.673

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

358.892

509.958

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.107

1.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.761

30.422

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.703

53.992

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2294

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3605

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2294

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3605

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3333

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1363	1714
PassMark - G2D Mark	287	231
Geekbench - OpenCL	4566	5605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.383	15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892	509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.107	1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.761	30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.703	53.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK106	GK106
Date de sortie	23 July 2013	30 May 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1101	1114
Prix maintenant	$159.99
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	667 MHz	657 MHz
Performance á point flottant	768.4 gflops	1,009 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	576	768
Taux de remplissage de la texture	32.02 GTexel / s	42.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	2,540 million	2,540 million
Vitesse augmenté		657 MHz
Noyaux CUDA		768
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized	large
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Options SLI		1
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	48.0 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	3008 MHz	2000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
TXAA