NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1920
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 17150
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 17150
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 960 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1920 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 8.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 versus 1873
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 13 November 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 versus 1873 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 5888 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11353 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU106B |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 29 January 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 197 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 960 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |