NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 705
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 14832
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 705 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 14832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 19565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 791 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 18872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 13943 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 175 | 112 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1035 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
