NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 14396
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 800
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 195.478
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 2129.009
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 14.889
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 129.271
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1328.033
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 14744
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 14744
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 7 August 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 14396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 14744 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 136722
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 136722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 14396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7527 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU102 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 170 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |