NVIDIA TITAN RTX versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 versus 19370
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 versus 136722
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3290
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 versus 19370 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 versus 136722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 280 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 827
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 280 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 827 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 136722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU102 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | $9,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 90 | 103 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN RTX avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
