NVIDIA Tesla M10 versus AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M10 and AMD Radeon R9 370X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M10
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1306 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 82.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4x 640 versus 1280
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4x 1,672 gflops versus 2,637 gflops
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4x 8 GB versus 2 GB
Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 27 August 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 82.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 640 versus 1280 |
Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops versus 2,637 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4x 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 5200 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 46.191
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 versus 814.192
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 50.918
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 180.026
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 5204
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3306
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 5204
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 5200 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 versus 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3306 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3172 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.191 | 65.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 814.192 | 1139.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.918 | 88.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 180.026 | 337.583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5204 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5204 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla M10 | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Trinidad |
Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 27 August 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 630 | 516 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4x 1,672 gflops | 2,637 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 640 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec | 82.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 221 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4x 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 4x 83.2 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |