NVIDIA Tesla M60 versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla M60 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla M60

versus

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M60

Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1051 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 93.6 GTexel / s
2.7x plus de pipelines: 2x 2048 versus 1,536
3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 4,833 gflops versus 2,995 gflops
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 8 GB versus 8 GB
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7927 versus 6930
Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 479
Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 26801 versus 22089
Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.389 versus 95.613
Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1451.124 versus 1341.18
Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.266 versus 6.869

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1178 MHz versus 1051 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 93.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2048 versus 1,536
Performance á point flottant	2x 4,833 gflops versus 2,995 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	2x 8 GB versus 8 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	7927 versus 6930
PassMark - G2D Mark	549 versus 479
Geekbench - OpenCL	26801 versus 22089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	114.389 versus 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1451.124 versus 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.266 versus 6.869

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Environ 75% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 975 MHz versus 557 MHz
3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 300 Watt
Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 versus 70.038
Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 366.321 versus 314.404
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 versus 8663
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 886
Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 1791
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 versus 8663
4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 886
Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 1791

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	975 MHz versus 557 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt versus 300 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683 versus 70.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321 versus 314.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399 versus 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 versus 1791
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399 versus 8663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 886
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 versus 1791

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M60
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7927

6930

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

549

479

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

26801

22089

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

114.389

95.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1451.124

1341.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.266

6.869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.038

83.683

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

314.404

366.321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8663

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

886

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1791

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8663

9399

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

886

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1791

3339

Nom	NVIDIA Tesla M60	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7927	6930
PassMark - G2D Mark	549	479
Geekbench - OpenCL	26801	22089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	114.389	95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1451.124	1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.266	6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	70.038	83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	314.404	366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8663	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	886	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1791	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8663	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	886	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1791	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Tesla M60	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Nom de code	GM204	GM204
Date de sortie	30 August 2015	18 August 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	466	448
Genre	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1178 MHz	1051 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	557 MHz	975 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2x 4,833 gflops	2,995 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2x 2048	1,536
Taux de remplissage de la texture	2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec	93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	100 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	5,200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	267 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 8-pin	None
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2x 8 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	2x 160.4 GB / s	160 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	2x 256 Bit	256 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus