Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 730 und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Jahr(e) 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 541.7x mehr Texturfüllrate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 192 vs 24
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 1237
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 299
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 4657
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1870
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 1596
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1870
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 1596
- 8.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 vs 68
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 2021 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 192 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 vs 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 1596 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 vs 68 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:350 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Startdatum | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 633 | 1234 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 24 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 192 | 24 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 1 |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

