AMD A10-6800B vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-6800B and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6800B

• Around 10% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz
• Around 9% higher maximum core temperature: 74°C vs 68°C
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2607 vs 983

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
• 20 more threads: 24 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2316 vs 1654
• 7.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 23093 vs 3106
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 8440 vs 6151

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-6800B
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1654 2316
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3106 23093
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2607 983
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	6151 8440

Compare specifications (specs)