AMD A10-7300 vs AMD Turion II M540

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-7300 and AMD Turion II M540 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7300

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1743 vs 912

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II M540

• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 967 vs 864

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-7300
CPU 2: AMD Turion II M540

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	864 967
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1743 912

Compare specifications (specs)