AMD A10-9630P vs AMD FX-6300

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9630P and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9630P

• Around 28% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 70.50°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1966 vs 527
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4857 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6300

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1486 vs 1390
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4220 vs 2946

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-9630P
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1390 1486
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2946 4220
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1966 527
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	4857 1914

Compare specifications (specs)