AMD A10-9700 vs AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Comparative analysis of AMD A10-9700 and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-9700

  • CPU is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • Around 36% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
  • Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.497 vs 5.563
  • 14.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 227.004 vs 15.951
  • 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.533 vs 0.293
  • 49.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.928 vs 0.569
  • 15.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.933 vs 5.726
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 July 2017 vs April 2010
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.497 vs 5.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.004 vs 15.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.533 vs 0.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.928 vs 0.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 87.933 vs 5.726

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 4.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2028 vs 493
  • 5.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7615 vs 1465
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 6 vs 4
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 2 MB
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 2028 vs 493
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 7615 vs 1465

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10-9700
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
493
2028
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1465
7615
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
20.497
5.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
227.004
15.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.533
0.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
27.928
0.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
87.933
5.726
Name AMD A10-9700 AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
PassMark - Single thread mark 1619
PassMark - CPU mark 3555
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 493 2028
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1465 7615
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 0 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.497 5.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 227.004 15.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.533 0.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.928 0.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 87.933 5.726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7174

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A10-9700 AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)

Essentials

Architecture codename Bristol Ridge Thuban
Family AMD A-Series Processors
Launch date 27 July 2017 April 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $90
OPN PIB AD9700AGABBOX
OPN Tray AD9700AGM44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 991 2427
Price now $79.99
Series AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops
Value for money (0-100) 20.04
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 3.5 GHz
Compute Cores 10
Die size 246 mm 346 mm
L2 cache 2 MB 512 KB (per core)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 45 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C
Maximum core temperature 90°C
Maximum frequency 3.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Number of cores 4 6
Number of GPU cores 6
Transistor count 1178 million 904 million
Unlocked
L1 cache 128 KB (per core)
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared)

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Supported memory frequency 2400 MHz
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 1029 MHz
iGPU core count 6
Processor graphics Radeon R7 Series
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX DirectX® 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Configurable TDP 45/65 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM4 AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 8
PCI Express revision 3.0 x8

Advanced Technologies

Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
TrueAudio
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)