AMD A10 Micro-6700T vs AMD A8-3520M

Comparative analysis of AMD A10 Micro-6700T and AMD A8-3520M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10 Micro-6700T

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 7x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 888 vs 274
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1693 vs 798

Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3520M

• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 845 vs 722
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1448 vs 1426

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10 Micro-6700T
CPU 2: AMD A8-3520M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	722 845
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1426 1448
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	888 274
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1693 798

Compare specifications (specs)