AMD A10 PRO-7800B vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Comparative analysis of AMD A10 PRO-7800B and AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A10 PRO-7800B

• Around 95% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1918 vs 1499
• 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6710 vs 3311

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A10 PRO-7800B
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1499 1918
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3311 6710

Compare specifications (specs)