AMD A4-3420 vs Intel Celeron 430
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3420 and Intel Celeron 430 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3420
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 56% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1119 vs 616
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1067 vs 288
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | December 2011 vs June 2007 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1119 vs 616 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1067 vs 288 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 430
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 907 vs 345
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 868 vs 612
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 907 vs 345 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 868 vs 612 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-3420
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 430
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD A4-3420 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1119 | 616 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1067 | 288 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 345 | 907 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 612 | 868 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A4-3420 | Intel Celeron 430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Llano | Conroe |
| Launch date | December 2011 | June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 2628 | 2623 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | |
| Price now | $16.52 | |
| Processor Number | 430 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.72 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 228 mm | 77 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | 105 million |
| Base frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 60.4°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1.0000V-1.3375V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM1 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||