AMD A4-5000 vs AMD Athlon II Neo K145

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-5000 and AMD Athlon II Neo K145 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-5000

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• 3 more threads: 4 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1292 vs 298

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K145

• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 592 vs 505

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-5000
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II Neo K145

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	505 592
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1292 298

Compare specifications (specs)