AMD A4-5300B vs AMD FX-6120

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-5300B and AMD FX-6120 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-5300B

• Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6120

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
• Around 13% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1414 vs 1237
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3899 vs 1247
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 483 vs 403
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1798 vs 622

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-5300B
CPU 2: AMD FX-6120

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1237 1414
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1247 3899
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	403 483
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	622 1798

Compare specifications (specs)